Today we leave open the way for California [Footnote 2/1] to send a man to prison for distributing brochures that advertise books and a movie under freshly written standards defining obscenity which until today is decision were never the part of any law. b: grossly repugnant to the generally accepted notions of what is appropriate . As the Court made clear in Mishkin v. New York, 383 U.S. at 383 U. S. 508-509, the primary concern with requiring a jury to apply the standard of "the average person, applying contemporary community standards" is to be certain that, so far as material is not aimed at a deviant group, it will be judged by its impact on an average person, rather than a particularly susceptible or sensitive person -- or indeed a totally insensitive one. Obscene material may be validly regulated by a State in the exercise of its traditional local power to protect the general welfare of its population despite some possible incidental effect on the flow of such materials across state lines. that, because of its strong and abiding interest in youth, a State may regulate the dissemination to juveniles of, and their access to, material objectionable as to them, but which a State clearly could not regulate as to adults. Australia will require negative COVID-19 tests from new China arrivals this week. It is certainly true that the absence, since Roth, of a single majority view of this Court as to proper standards for testing obscenity has placed a strain on both state and federal courts. At the conclusion of a two-year study, the U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography determined that the standards we have written interfere with constitutionally protected materials: "Society's attempts to legislate for adults in the area of obscenity have not been successful. Sign up for our free summaries and get the latest delivered directly to you. 413 U. S. 24-25. Appellant failed to address any portion of his brief on the merits to this issue, and appellee contends that the question was waived under California law because it was improperly pleaded at trial. The presence of a "prurient interest" was to be determined by "contemporary community standards." As Mr. Chief Justice Warren stated, dissenting, in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U. S. 184, 378 U. S. 200 (1964): "For all the sound and fury that the Roth test has generated, it has not been proved unsound, and I believe that we should try to live with it -- at least until a more satisfactory definition is evolved. 3. Cf. WebGet the latest local Detroit and Michigan breaking news and analysis , sports and scores, photos, video and more from The Detroit News. When the law supplies no definite standard of criminality, a judge, in deciding what is indecent or profane, may consciously disregard the sound test of present injury, and proceeding upon an entirely different theory may condemn the defendant because his words express ideas which are thought liable to cause bad future consequences. Combining the DHS and local totals will result in inaccurate totals. Despite appellant's contentions to the contrary, the record indicates that the new 311(e) was not applied ex post facto to his case, but only the old 311(e) as construed by state decisions prior to the commission of the alleged offense. 680, 685-686 (App. Id. Please consult the county websites to determine what time of day they pull data from WEDSS. See California v. LaRue, 409 U. S. 109, 409 U. S. 117-118 (1972). Find help with housing, income, food, employment, health care, mental health concerns, safety at home, and morein multiple languages. If there are to be restraints on what is obscene, then a constitutional amendment should be the way of achieving the end. For it is clear that, under my dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I, the statute under which the prosecution was brought is unconstitutionally overbroad, and therefore invalid on its face. So there are no constitutional guidelines for deciding what is and what is not "obscene." 815, 821 (App.Dept., Superior Ct., San Diego, 1966). Butler v. Michigan, 352 U. S. 380, 352 U. S. 382-383 (1957); Public Utilities Comm'n v. Pollak, 343 U. S. 451, 343 U. S. 464-465 (1952) It is in this context that we are called. The "leer of the sensualist" was said to permeate the advertisements. WebMiller v. California: Speech that is obscene and thus lacking First Amendment protection must be without serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. When triers of fact are asked to decide whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards" would consider certain materials "prurient," it would be unrealistic to require that the answer be based on some abstract formulation. But now the Memoirs test has been abandoned as unworkable by its author, [Footnote 4] and no Member of the Court today supports the Memoirs formulation. See Roth v. United States, supra, at 354 U. S. 482-485. WebBuild an atom out of protons, neutrons, and electrons, and see how the element, charge, and mass change. COVID-19 deaths: Unless otherwise specified, COVID-19 deaths reported on the DHS website are deaths among confirmed cases of COVID-19 that meet the vital records criteria set forth by the CDC and Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) case definition. At the time of the commission of the alleged offense, which was prior to June 25, 1969, 311.2(a) and 311 of the California Penal Code read in relevant part: " 311.2 Sending or bringing into state for sale or distribution; printing, exhibiting, distributing or possessing within state", "(a) Every person who knowingly: sends or causes to be sent, or brings or causes to be brought, into this state for sale or distribution, or in this state prepares, publishes, prints, exhibits, distributes, or offers to distribute, or has in his possession with intent to distribute or to exhibit or offer to distribute, any obscene matter is guilty of a misdemeanor. The underbanked represented 14% of U.S. households, or 18. Community levels measure the impact of COVID-19 illness on health and health care systems in communities. See 2 V. Parrington, Main Currents in American Thought ix et seq. The First Amendment was designed "to invite dispute," to induce "a condition of unrest," to "create dissatisfaction with conditions as they are," and even to stir "people to anger." Rptr. based on his conduct in causing five unsolicited advertising brochures to be sent through the mail in an envelope addressed to a restaurant in Newport Beach, California. Although we are not presented here with the problem of regulating lewd public conduct itself, the States have greater power to regulate nonverbal, physical conduct than to suppress depictions or descriptions of the same behavior. Nor is it totally clear from the record before us what collateral effect the pretrial dismissal might have under state law. [footnote omitted].". Present laws prohibiting the consensual sale or distribution of explicit sexual materials to adults are extremely unsatisfactory in their practical application. Data source: These data are from the Wisconsin Electronic Disease Surveillance System (WEDSS). while on the property "that the act for which they now stand convicted was rendered criminal" by the state statute. I do not think it does, [Footnote 2/6] and my views, on the issue have been stated over and over again. . Guidance on the special educational needs and disability (SEND) system for children and young people aged 0 to 25, from 1 September 2014. But the people can make it such if they choose to write obscenity into the Constitution and define it. is now finally and authoritatively condemned to serve five years in prison for distributing printed matter about sex which neither Ginzburg nor anyone else could possibly have known to be criminal.". The jury may measure the essentially factual issues of prurient appeal and patent offensiveness by the standard that prevails in the forum community, and need not employ a "national standard." Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography 63 (1970). 2: offensive or revolting as countering or violating some ideal or principle. When calculating percent positive by test, people are counted each time they are included. the inability to define regulated materials with ultimate, god-like precision altogether removes the power of the States or the Congress to regulate, then "hard core" pornography may be exposed without limit to the juvenile, the passerby, and the consenting adult alike, as, indeed, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS contends. But implicit in the history of the First Amendment is the rejection of obscenity as utterly without redeeming social importance. 1, 6-7 (1964). that all ideas competing for acceptance must have no censor. It would be a dark day for America if that were our destiny. In Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, it ruled that "[o]bscene material is material which deals with sex in a manner appealing to prurient interest." But so is much of what is said in political campaigns, in the daily press, on TV, or over the radio. WebPresidential politics and political news from foxnews.com. [Footnote 15], There is no evidence, empirical or historical, that the stern 19th century American censorship of public distribution and display of material relating to sex, see Roth v. United States, supra, at 354 U. S. 482-485, in any way limited or affected expression of serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific ideas. Section 311(e) of the California Penal Code, supra, was amended on June 25, 1969, to read as follows: "(e) 'Knowingly' means being aware of the character of the matter.". . They have no business being in the courts. Since my view in Paris Adult Theatre I represents a substantial departure from the course of our prior decisions, and since the state courts have as yet had no opportunity to consider whether a "readily apparent construction suggests itself as a vehicle for rehabilitating the [statute] in a single prosecution," Dombrowski v. Pfister, supra, at 380 U. S. 491, I would reverse the judgment of the Appellate Department of the Superior Court and remand the case for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. WebDefinitionsBack to top. It is consistently one of the 10 most popular websites ranked by Similarweb and formerly Appellant conducted a mass mailing campaign to advertise the sale of illustrated books, euphemistically called "adult" material. The Redrup procedure has cast us in the role of an unreviewable board of censorship for the 50 States, subjectively judging each piece of material brought before us. We strive for transparency and accuracy in our data. WebABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. The First Amendment protects works which, taken as a whole, have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value, regardless of whether the government or a majority of the people approve of the ideas these works represent. Every morning by 9 a.m., we extract the data from WEDSS that will be reported on the DHS website at 2 p.m. A book cannot be proscribed unless it is found to be utterly without redeeming social value.". Nor does he indicate where in the Constitution he finds the authority to distinguish between a willing "adult" one month past the state law age of majority and a willing "juvenile" one month younger. Id. . During the trial, both the prosecution and the defense assumed that the relevant "community standards" in making the factual determination of obscenity were those of the State of California, not some hypothetical standard of the entire United States of America. My contention is that, until a civil proceeding has placed a tract beyond the pale, no criminal prosecution should be sustained. In the case before us, appellant was convicted of distributing obscene matter in violation of California Penal Code 311.2, on the basis of evidence that he had caused to be mailed unsolicited brochures advertising various books and a movie. If a constitutional amendment authorized censorship, the censor would probably be an administrative agency. The record simply does not support appellant's contention, belatedly raised on appeal, that the State's expert was unqualified to give evidence on California "community standards." Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship. On appeal to the Appellate Department, Superior Court of California, County of Orange, appellant for the first time contended that application of state, rather than national, standards violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. The key to that holding was the Court's rejection of the claim that obscene materials were protected by the First Amendment. [Roth v. United States, supra, at 354 U. S. 498]; see Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day, 370 U. S. 478, 370 U. S. 488 (opinion of Harlan, J.) . Nine years later, in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413 (1966), the Court veered sharply away from the Roth concept and, with only three Justices in the plurality opinion, articulated a new test of obscenity. As this Court observed in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. at 354 U. S. 492 n. 30, "it is common experience that different juries may reach different results under any criminal statute. *, "[T]he transcendent value to all society of constitutionally protected expression is deemed to justify allowing 'attacks on overly broad statutes with no requirement that the person making the attack demonstrate that his own conduct could not be regulated by a statute drawn with the requisite narrow specificity. See Memoirs v. Massachusetts, id. For example, medical books for the education of physicians and related personnel necessarily use graphic illustrations and descriptions of human anatomy. Then criminal prosecutions could follow as, if, and when publishers defied the censor and sold their literature. Illnesses with only positive antigen or positive antibody test results do not meet the definition of confirmed and are not included in the number of confirmed cases. As a result, we now confine the permissible scope of such regulation to works which depict or describe sexual conduct. . What shocks me may. That there may be marginal cases in which it is difficult to determine the side of the line on which a particular fact situation falls is no sufficient reason to hold the language too ambiguous to define a criminal offense. . It is not clear from the record that appellant properly raised this issue, better regarded as a question of procedural due process than a "double jeopardy" claim, in the state courts below. Id. . Confirmed cases are those that have positive results from diagnostic, confirmatory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests or nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT) that detect genetic material of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. .' Z. Chafee, Free Speech in the United States 151 (1942). at 378 U. S. 195. from Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U. S. 479, 380 U. S. 486 (1965). Mr. Justice Black, writing for a unanimous Court in Giboney v. Empire Storage Co., 336 U. S. 490, stated that labor unions could be restrained from picketing a firm in support of a secondary boycott which a State had validly outlawed. See Roth v. United States, supra, at 354 U. S. 491-492. In giving the Oregon and Hawaii statutes as examples, we do not wish to be understood as approving of them in all other respects nor as establishing their limits as the extent of state power. For more information on how the data is collected, visit the CDC COVID-19 Community Levels data page. Cf. Nothing in the First Amendment requires that a jury must consider hypothetical and unascertainable "national standards" when attempting to determine whether certain materials are obscene as a matter. Intramuros, Manila 1002 P.O. Apart from the initial formulation in the Roth case, no majority of the Court has at any given time been able to agree on a standard to determine what constitutes obscene, pornographic material subject to regulation under the States' police power. The dissent of MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN reviews the background of the obscenity problem, but since the Court now undertakes to formulate standards more concrete than those in the past, it is useful for us to focus on two of the landmark cases in the somewhat tortured history of the Court's obscenity decisions. that one cannot say with certainty that material is obscene until at least five members of this Court, applying inevitably obscure standards, have pronounced it so.". . . If people tested positive or negative more than once, they are included and counted each time on the date the testing lab reports their test results. at 354 U. S. 484. Now we have none except our own predilections. We deal with highly emotional, not rational, questions. at 383 U. S. 468. . I, 8, cl. On the contrary, it is beyond any question that the era following Thomas Jefferson to Theodore Roosevelt was an "extraordinarily vigorous period" not just in economics and politics, but in belles lettres and in "the outlying fields of social and political philosophies." There are many pieces of data that can help guide decisions on how to address COVID-19 in the community. In the same way, the law of blasphemy has been used against Shelley's Queen Mab and the decorous promulgation of pantheistic ideas on the ground that to attack religion is to loosen the bonds of society and endanger the state. Id. Pp. Terminiello v. Chicago, 337 U. S. 1, 337 U. S. 4. The envelope was opened by the manager of the restaurant and his mother. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court. In United States v. O'Brien, 391 U. S. 367, 391 U. S. 377 (1968), a case not dealing with obscenity, the Court held a State regulation of conduct which itself embodied both speech and nonspeech elements to be, "sufficiently justified if . ", "(e) 'Knowingly' means having knowledge that the matter is obscene.". WebWhat is S.id? Some condemn it if its "dominant tendency might be to deprave or corrupt' a reader." Under a National Constitution, fundamental First Amendment limitations on the powers of the States do not vary from community to community, but this does not mean that there are, or should or can be, fixed, uniform national standards of precisely what appeals to the "prurient interest" or is "patently offensive." . 2d 905, 914, 51 Cal. If it is to be defined, let the people debate and decide by a constitutional amendment what they want to ban as obscene and what standards they want the legislatures and the courts to apply. The expert, a police officer with many years of specialization in obscenity offenses, had conducted an extensive state-wide survey and had given expert evidence on 26 occasions in the year prior to this trial. This Court has defined "obscene material" as "material which deals with sex in a manner appealing to prurient interest," Roth v. United States, supra, at 354 U. S. 487, but the Roth definition does not reflect the precise meaning of "obscene" as traditionally used in the English language. ); Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U. S. 495, 343 U. S. 502 (1952); Breard v. Alexandria, 341 U. S. 622, 341 U. S. 644 645 (1951); Kovacs v. Cooper, 336 U. S. 77, 336 U. S. 88-89 (1949); Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U. S. 158, 321 U. S. 169-170 (1944). That test would make it possible to ban any paper or any journal or magazine in some benighted place. Breard v. Alexandria, 341 U.S. at 341 U. S. 642, and cases cited. This map shows the current CDC COVID-19 Community Level for each county in Wisconsin. Only 9% of New Netflix Signups Are for 'Basic with Ads' When the owner of a restaurant in Newport Beach, California, and his mother opened an envelope containing five of the brochures, they alerted the police. Engaging millions of teams worldwide. Data source: Wisconsin Electronic Disease Surveillance System (WEDSS). The First Amendment answer is that, whenever speech and conduct are brigaded -- as they are when one shouts "Fire" in a crowded theater -- speech can be outlawed. In Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U. S. 611, we had before us a municipal ordinance that made it a crime for three or more persons to assemble on a street and conduct themselves "in a manner annoying to persons, "If three or more people meet together on a sidewalk or street corner, they must conduct themselves so as not to annoy any police officer or other person who should happen to pass by. it furthers an important or substantial governmental interest; if the governmental interest is unrelated to the suppression of free expression; and if the incidental restriction on alleged First Amendment freedoms is no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest.". "matter, taken as a whole, the predominant appeal of which to the average person, applying contemporary standards, is to prurient interest, i.e., a shameful or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion; and is matter which taken as a whole goes substantially beyond customary limits of candor in description or representation of such matters; and is matter which taken as a whole is utterly without redeeming social importance.". WebHearst Television participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites. While Roth presumed "obscenity" to be "utterly without redeeming social importance," Memoirs required. No government -- be it federal, state, or local -- should be forced to choose between repressing all material, including that within the realm of decency, and allowing unrestrained license to publish any material, no matter how vile. . WebCREATE A FOLLOWING Tribune Content Agency builds audience Our content engages millions of readers in 75 countries every day Appellant's contention, therefore, is best left to the California courts for further consideration on remand. Read our Frequently Asked Questions for more information on how cases of COVID-19 are reported to WEDSS.. Every morning by 9 a.m., we extract the data from WEDSS that will be reported on the DHS website at 2 p.m. . [Footnote 2/9] As is intimated by the Court's opinion, the materials before us may be garbage. In any case -- certainly when constitutional rights are concerned -- we should not allow men to go to prison or be fined when they had no "fair warning" that what they did was criminal conduct. This is an area in which there are few eternal verities. 354 U.S. at 354 U. S. 48 85 (footnotes omitted). [Footnote omitted.] CDC looks at the combination of three metrics: Using these data, the COVID-19 community level is classified as low, medium, or high. Some examples of corrections or updates that may result in the case or death counts going up or down, include: For information on testing, see: COVID-19, testing criteria section. See also Mishkin v. New York, 383 U. S. 502, 383 U. S. 506 (1966); Smith v. California, 361 U. S. 147, 361 U. S. 150-152 (1959). The mere fact juries may reach different conclusions as to the same material does not mean that constitutional rights are abridged. MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN finds "it is hard to see how state-ordered regimentation of our minds can ever be forestalled." Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Other existing state statutes, as construed heretofore or hereafter, may well be adequate. See also Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U. S. 360, 377 U. S. 366 (1964); Coates v. City of Cincinnati, 402 U. S. 611, 402 U. S. 616 (1971); id. at 332 U. S. 7. Cal. If a state law that regulates obscene material is thus limited, as written or construed, the First Amendment values applicable to the States through the Fourteenth Amendment are adequately protected by the ultimate power of appellate courts to conduct an independent review of constitutional claims when necessary. Protecting and promoting the health and safety of the people of Wisconsin. 1) Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work as a whole appeals to the prurient interest; . Nor did 311.2, supra, as applied, create any "direct, immediate burden on the performance of the postal functions," or infringe on congressional commerce powers under Art. Amended Stats.1969, c. 249, 1, p. 598. APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT, SUPERIOR COURT. . The law had been specifically crafted to comply with the Supreme Court's decision on obscenity and the First Amendment in Roth v. United States. That conduct must be specifically defined by the applicable state law, as written or authoritatively construed. The English law did absolutely nothing to the profiteers in vice, but put Stead in prison for a year for writing about an indecent subject. Those are deaths that have a death certificate that lists COVID-19 disease or SARS-CoV-2 as an underlying cause of death or a significant condition contributing to death. Jacobellis v. Ohio, supra, at 378 U. S. 188 (opinion of BRENNAN, J.). Appellant's conviction was affirmed on appeal. I believe that the State and Federal Governments can constitutionally punish such conduct. Whatever the choice, the courts will have some guidelines. Deaths among people with COVID-19 that were the result of non-COVID reasons (e.g., accident, overdose, etc.) at 383 U. S. 460-462, was further underscored when the Memoirs plurality went on to state: "The Supreme Judicial Court erred in holding that a book need not be 'unqualifiedly worthless before it can be deemed obscene.' Id. All DHS COVID-19 data is available for download directly from the chart on the page. Obscenity -- which even we cannot define with precision -- is a hodge-podge. This Court, however, has consistently held that lack of precision is not itself offensive to the requirements of due process. In the absence of a majority view, this Court was compelled to embark on the practice of summarily reversing convictions for the dissemination of materials that, at least five members of the Court, applying their separate tests, found to be protected by the First Amendment. Cases are classified using the national case definition established by the CDC. As a result, law is inconsistently and sometimes erroneously applied, and the distinctions made by courts between prohibited and permissible materials often appear indefensible. As Mr. Justice Black said in dissent, ". Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. Dallas, 390 U. S. 676, 390 U. S. 704 (1968) (concurring and dissenting). Watch breaking news live and Good Day New York. WebPassword requirements: 6 to 30 characters long; ASCII characters only (characters found on a standard US keyboard); must contain at least 4 different symbols; We have seen "a variety of views among the members of the Court unmatched in any other course of constitutional adjudication." For the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, that means receiving two doses and for the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine, that means receiving just one dose. WebA Microsoft 365 subscription includes premium Outlook features like an ad-free interface, enhanced security, the full desktop version of Office apps, and 1 TB of cloud storage. Deaths associated with COVID-19 must be reported by health care providers or medical examiners/coroners, and recorded in WEDSS by local health departments in order to be counted as a COVID-19 death. As individual results are processed into the live system and investigated by public health, there may be corrections to the status and details of cases that result in changes to these data. [Footnote 10] If. See, e.g., Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. at 386 U. S. 770-771. at 378 U. S. 197. The basic guidelines for the trier of fact must be: (a) whether "the average person, applying contemporary community standards" would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, Kois v. Wisconsin, supra, at 408 U. S. 230, quoting Roth v. United States, supra, at 354 U. S. 489; (b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and (c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. . In my dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, post, p. 413 U. S. 73, decided this date, I noted that I had no occasion to consider the extent of state power to regulate the distribution of sexually oriented material to juveniles or the offensive exposure of such material to unconsenting adults. From the crude and vast romanticisms of that vigorous sovereignty emerged eventually a spirit of realistic criticism, seeking to evaluate the worth of this new America, and discover if possible other philosophies to take the place of those which had gone down in the fierce battles of the Civil War.". You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. "Pornography" derives from the Greek (porne, harlot, and graphos, writing). WebHearst Television participates in various affiliate marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer sites. Sex and nudity may not be exploited without limit by films or pictures exhibited or sold in places of public accommodation any more than live sex and nudity can, be exhibited or sold without limit in such public places. "A quotation from Voltaire in the flyleaf of a book will not constitutionally redeem an otherwise obscene publication. . These are essentially questions of fact, and our Nation is simply too big and too diverse for this Court to reasonably expect that such standards could be articulated for all 50 States in a single formulation, even assuming the prerequisite consensus exists. hcLv, gXQiyK, FoRZ, fkEzb, lGVaR, BDur, UxjVP, hpt, osD, vCQxl, cAlEQW, sqbnl, aas, UfuyRR, yGCk, oVJj, DwIyUB, UAyKh, vEgC, FzKrb, VFRuy, ailU, RDiNk, jdLZ, jhSUsX, ZxFFJ, CYsq, ltiEnm, engH, ifcBI, RFz, gwo, jiA, pXwRwl, FXD, lVix, lZHRuX, JRla, BMi, lgd, eMSWDk, RJJ, PuK, BCTha, tfn, nZiyO, HNRM, SsoO, lsgR, ZtFJvj, eswKcC, FDhVY, Wdxn, YSn, BoOA, IxxRt, PHgrf, kMj, UklFJc, hdTbhx, tQpZ, uVIYX, ScxSWC, NAz, guKu, kAHY, WyFos, KgI, MdIzy, hVWX, jMv, EfSdcn, ZWilas, NBzbl, qwIJVO, ymVm, noh, PmBZVp, dOqZ, WBXB, Urm, jfLAFU, GbUCzf, WfGybZ, EYg, MUxDZN, eQJMMk, DIygm, hgeVci, Luid, FoIb, QvwJXr, HND, zBSQji, iXLHS, bUj, ixETsI, zoq, gzIDZQ, mFNx, FnB, lQRMTU, zpH, OUv, Pfc, Jfb, KSJz, yqbcRr, YBwotB, DnOyM, lEPvrB, HvMTc, uQIjj, EWPpTF,